Thursday, January 29, 2009

learning from Iceland--

I read in a magazine and then googled this- women in Iceland keep their maiden names.
Today, in The Week, I read that Iceland has their first female prime minister. In addition, she is lesbian. Iceland doesn't care. Why do we?I love the line in this article where someone from Iceland says that they view it as perverted to be concerned with someone else's sexual orientation. I also really liked the statement that she is not popular politically because of or inspite of her orientation, but for her success.

Thank you Iceland: for making me feel that much more justified in keeping my maiden name and for providing an example of simply not caring about sexual orientation.

Follow this link to the original, or read below. Iceland's Gay Leadership (yes that is actually the title of the article)

p.s. If you don't know about The Week: it is an excellent and unbiased news source that reports snippets from various other sources in a weekly (daily online) compilation.



Iceland's Social Affairs Minister Johanna Sigurdardottir becomes interim prime minister.

News & Opinion
Thursday, January 29, 2009

Iceland’s gay leadership

What happened
Icelandic social affairs minister Johanna Sigurdardottir, 66, was tapped to be her country’s first female prime minister, and the world’s first openly gay one, after the island nation’s conservative government fell alongside Iceland’s collapsing banks and currency and soaring unemployment and inflation. Sigurdardottir will serve as interim leader until May elections. (AP in Yahoo! News)

What the commentators said
It’s hard to believe that anything good could come from the global credit crisis, said Britain’s The Independent in an editorial, but Sigurdardottir’s appointment is “one incontrovertibly cheering” result. Of course Iceland is, “to put no fine a point on it, bankrupt,” but perhaps she can succeed where her male predecessor failed—all of Iceland’s major banks are now headed by women, too.

The fact that she’s gay is “bigger news” than that she’s a woman, said Andy Seccombe in the New York Press. But while a gay woman rising to “the Icey Office,” and a black man being sworn in to the Oval Office, are “important milestones,” both leaders face dire fiscal situations, and how they tackle them “is ultimately the real issue.”

Right, so why is everyone outside of Iceland focusing on her sexual orientation? said Icelandic journalist Iris Erlingsdottir in The Huffington Post. Sigurdardottir has been in parliament since 1978 and, with a 73 percent approval rating, is Iceland’s most popular politician—and not because of or in spite of her sexuality. “Who cares?”

Sure, “Icelanders consider it ‘perverted’ to even care about someone’s sexual orientation,” said Rady Ananda in OpEdNews, but it’s “of great relevance in those societies where sexual minorities are criminalized or marginalized.” That includes the U.S., where laws “ban full civil rights” for gays and lesbians.

Tuesday, January 6, 2009

scientology: ethical?

not sure whether I feel bad that they are being harshly criticized after their son died or am appalled that they most likely refused him proven treatment because of a religion made up by a science fiction writer. maybe both.

Arts & Leisure
Tuesday, January 6, 2009

Scientology and the death of Travolta's son

The Church of Scientology’s “pharmaceutical-phobia” may have been “part of the short, sad story of Jett Travolta,” said Kevin Libb in the National Post. The official cause of death of John Travolta and Kelly Preston’s 16-year-old son has been determined to be due to a “seizure disorder,” and given that the Travoltas “are devout members of the highest stratum” of the Church of Scientology—which “frequently rejects brain-related diagnoses”—Jett’s “reported brain dysfunctions may never have had a proper medical diagnosis.”

It’s “incredible” how many people who know “so little are nonetheless diagnosing Jett Travolta’s supposed illness,” said Margery Eagan in the Boston Herald, “prescribing the correct treatment for that illness, and judging his devastated parents’ alleged failings.” Not only is this “creepy and vile,” but “judging celebrity victims” so viciously suggests a “whole new layer of entitlement” held by the public. Simply stated: Leave the Travoltas alone.

“My heart goes out to the Travolta family for their devastating loss,” said Kris Rasmussen in Beliefnet. But there are “some pretty big gaps in the details surrounding Jett's death.” The Travoltas “could do a great service” to other families facing similar challenges “by coming out and explaining Jett's condition and the treatment they decided to use.” It might also give them “peace from endless future speculation.”

click here for the original posting